My Mirror column:
Kamal Haasan's Hey Ram, released twenty years ago this February, is a complex, unresolved film about India's unresolved inner life.
Kamal Haasan's Hey Ram, released twenty years ago this February, is a complex, unresolved film about India's unresolved inner life.
A man returns to the Calcutta building
in which his wife was raped and murdered in a riot. He stands in the
street, looking up at their old balcony, and she appears there,
beckoning him as she used to. When he climbs up the stairs, the new
occupant mistakes the name he mentions for that of the person he is
looking for.
Mr. Nair: “All the tenants here are
new. What's the name again?”
Saket Ram: “Saket Ram.”
Mr. Nair: “When did you see him
last?”
Saket Ram: “Whom?”
Mr. Nair: “Saket Ram.”
Saket Ram: “A year ago, exactly.”
Mr. Nair: “A year ago there was a
massacre. Many of the people in this building died. Maybe your friend
also... Sorry.
Saket Ram: “It's alright.”
Mr. Nair: “What was your relationship
to this Saket Ram?”
Saket Ram: “Like that of the body to
the soul. We were very good friends.”
It is a moment typical of Hey Ram: the
visuals dense with imagery, the dialogue packed with associations, a
certain excess that seems ready to leap off the screen. Our Tamil
protagonist's lovely Bengali first wife Aparna -- played by Rani
Mukherjee, her character's name a nod to Sharmila Tagore as Apu's
wife in Satyajit Ray's Apur Sansar, a cinematic emblem of perfect
young marital domesticity and early death -- is dead. But she haunts
her living husband, appearing everywhere – in the balcony of what
was her own home, but also writhing in a pool of blood in his new
wife's bathroom, or smiling in the faces of other women, or assuming
the form of a goddess. Meanwhile, Saket Ram (Kamal Haasan, his
character carrying the old poetic name for Ayodhya) lives through the
trauma of Aparna's death, but in his acquiescence to Mr. Nair's
words, we hear a tacit acknowledgement that perhaps he is not quite
alive. Did Saket Ram's soul die with Aparna that Direct Action Day,
leaving his body to wander the streets, available for possession by
more devious spirits?
It seems no coincidence that Haasan's
Saket Ram first encounters the film's other Ram in those very
Calcutta streets, in a moment that has the two men literally
mirroring each other, in name and in gesture. But Saket Ram is a man
in trauma, speaking of surrendering to the police to confess about
the Muslim men he has just killed, only one of them the actual rapist
and murderer of his wife: he carries the stains, literally, on his
white kurta. Shriram Abhyankar (Atul Kulkarni) is a RSS-influenced
Hindu fundamentalist, who has covered over an old wound with a new
skin of pure hatred. “There is no punishment for doing one's duty.
If killing is a crime then so is war, isn't it?” asks Abhyankar.
And when Ram protests that he is a mere civilian, Abhyankar counters
smoothly: “This is civil war.”
And it is certainly no coincidence that
the film's other reference to body and soul is when Abhyankar,
finding himself paralysed waist downwards in a riding accident, tells
Ram that he must now “be his body” and carry out their mission of
assassinating Gandhi, whom Abhyankar and his ilk believe a traitor to
the so-called Hindu cause, because of Gandhi's sustained support to
the idea that the Muslims have as legitimate a claim to live in India
as the majority community does.
Haasan's film is among the most
detailed filmic depictions we have of the Hindutva mindset -- not
just the admiration for Hitler and the distaste for Gandhi, but how
that maps onto an eroticised masculinity in which violence and
nationalism come together with a reworked Hindu renunciatory ideal.
But there is great confusion in this mindset. In one of the film's
most honest, most complicated scenes, Ram imbibes an opium drink
given to him by Abhyankar, and it is in that opium-induced haze that
he both finally feels the stirrings of sexual attraction to his new
young wife Mythili, and agrees, in effect, to leave her side. When he
makes love to her, he fantasises about a giant gun. To become a
warrior for Hindutva, Ram must take a pledge to “renounce bondage
and relationships”. We see him touch, in one seamless gesture, the
picture of his unseen dead mother and the map of India, both of which
he can only love as abstractions – and leave the house, abandoning
for his grand masculine mission all the real, maternal figures he
knows, including the newly-pregnant Mythili (Sita to match Ram).
In a directorial sleight-of-hand that
makes fine use of both melodrama and coincidence, Haasan ensures that
this would-be Godse suddenly finds himself being defended from
suspicious Muslims somewhere near Jama Masjid by his trusted old
Muslim friend Amjad (Shah Rukh Khan) – and then, in a matter of
minutes, defending Amjad and all the other Muslims holed up in the
nicely-named Azad Soda Factory.
There is a great deal more that can be
said about Hey Ram, but let me end here on the note that Amjad does.
In a dying declaration to the police trying to identify the armed
Hindu assailant whose entry into the curfew-bound Jama Masjid area
set off the bloodbath, Amjad is asked if he had ever seen Bhairav
before. Bhairav is the name Ram had assumed on that excursion, and
also the name of Lord Shiva's destructive form. “I have never seen
that animal before,” says Amjad. “I only know Ram, my brother. He
saved my life.”
Published in Mumbai Mirror, 23 Feb 2020.
No comments:
Post a Comment