An interview with one of my favourite contemporary writers, the inimitable Siddharth Chowdhury, for Scroll:
‘I see my individual books as part of one big novel that I am working towards.’ |
Siddharth
Chowdhury's first published book was a short story collection called
Diksha at St. Martins (Srishti, 2002). Some characters who first
appeared in those stories, like Ritwik Ray and Mira Verma, went on to
play starring roles in his next book, the brilliantly unpredictable
Patna
Roughcut
(Picador, 2005).
Chowdhury's next novel Day
Scholar (2010) saw a shift of setting from 1980s Patna to 1990s Delhi, with a
new narrator called Hriday Thakur opening up a deeply male world of
Bihari hostellers who live on the fringes of Delhi University and in
the terrifying shadow of Zorawar Singh Shokeen, political broker and
property dealer—and their landlord.
His most recent book, The
Patna Manual of Style
(2015), is a set of interlinked stories that returns us to Hriday's
world a few years after Day
Scholar
with Chowdhury's usual comic acuity.
Chowdhury's
fiction combines a joyful political incorrectness with deep affection
for the characters who populate his world, the idealist, the
eccentric and the downright dubious. He is possibly a combination of
these things himself. He is also quietly holding out against the
onslaught of everything 21st
century publishing tells writers they should do to gain readers:
Facebook, Twitter, book launches and litfests. We agreed on an email
interview, but he prefers to write by hand, and so I received his
handwritten (photocopied) responses by courier. A couple of follow-up
questions were answered on SMS.
Both
your recurring protagonists Ritwik Ray and Hriday Thakur share their
Bengali-from-Patna past, their Delhi University present and their
writerly ambitions with you. What's easy and what's difficult about
using autobiographical material?
The trajectory of my novels and stories is autobiographical. But autobiography can only be a take-off point for the imagination to soar, I feel. So 90% of my fiction is pure storytelling. Fiction is the only medium through which I engage with the world. So a lot of other elements—politics, social commentary, various axes to grind—seep into the fiction as I go about stringing the reader and myself along. In the first draft I rarely have a clue where the story would take me. By the second draft things become clearer. The difficult thing is when readers start imagining that all of it is autobiographical. But I have realized over the years that, too, gives pleasure to some readers.
In
The
Patna Manual of Style,
Zakir Hussain College and Delhi University's English departments are
populated with professors who teach at these places in real life,
some thinly disguised, and some named. You once said that your
parents in Patna tell people who ask that your books are “out of
print”. How have friends and acquaintances who have
read
your books responded to becoming characters in them?
My friends and family rarely become characters in my fiction. Once in a while I would introduce a real person to establish locale or atmosphere, and more often than not it is meant as a tribute. So it is with my teachers in Zakir, like Lima Kanungo and Anuradha Marwah, or Vikram Seth or Sujit Mukherjee when I talk about publishing in 'Death of a Proofreader'. I never introduce a real person in my stories to spite them. Using real people or institutions also imparts a sense of hyper-reality and leavens the more fabulist elements in my fiction.
The
wishes of my parents have now actually come true. Both Diksha
at St. Martins
[his first short story collection] and Patna
Roughcut
are out of print. Day
Scholar will
be, too, if Picador doesn't bring out a paperback soon.
How
do you name your characters?
Very carefully. I collect names. I like names with a bit of vajan, as they say in Patna. With the right name half of your work is done. It is like casting in movies. Sometimes I feel I could have been another Lynn Stalmaster.
Your
characters often live inside books and films, from Javed “would
have been a friend of Ghalib's” Siddiqui in the first story in
Diksha
at St. Martin's
(2002) to Ritwik Ray in
Patna Roughcut
kissing Mira Verma “how James Dean had kissed Natalie Wood in Rebel
Without a Cause”. This
carries on into The
Patna Manual of Style:
Hriday's
girlfriend from Dhanbad (named Charulata, like the Satyajit Ray film)
reminds him of Supriya Chowdhury in Meghe
Dhaka Tara
(a Ritwik Ghatak film); a Patna girl is named Sophia after Sophia
Loren in Marriage,
Italian Style
and haunted by the film all her life; even Jishnu da, importer of
blondes, expresses his angst by reciting the poetry of Ramdhari Singh
'Dinkar'. Other characters write imaginary books -- Lawrence
Lytton-Mobray's Purulia-set detective stories, Anjali Singh Nalwa's
Tarn
Taran,
or my favourite, Ritwik Ray's Mao
for the Misbegotten – but
are described as
reviewed in real journals, like EPW
and Biblio.
Is this all just your own fiction-haunted mind writ large, or do you
really know a lot of people like this?
Well, I do know a lot of people who want to write, or to act or to direct movies, but have chosen to do something else for a living. Of course most of them have artistic ambitions without the requisite talent. But it is a good thing. I don't mock it. I like writers and write about their world. It is an abiding theme. So to me an unpublished writer is as important as a published one.
Ramdhari
Singh 'Dinkar' is a Patna speciality, and I, like many others of my
generation, can quote him in chunks. It is like Pushkin and the
Russians.
I
know how hard it is to write a halfway-decent poem or a story, so
writers would always have my compassion. But in the end, it is all
fiction, the wisp of blue smoke curling away from my mind.
What
books have been your strongest influences? And anything you read
lately that you were struck by?
Well, Philip Roth, Hemingway, Arthur Miller, the early Naipaul, Salinger, Jack Kerouac have been significant influences. Lately I have enjoyed The Lowland by Jhumpa Lahiri a lot.
What
do you re-read?
I re-read the collected stories of John Cheever, the first 49 stories of Hemingway, parts of Anna Karenina and A Sportsman's Sketches by Turgenev once in a while.
Your
books have always declared your cinephilia. Do you have favourite
filmmakers, or genres, or eras? Would you ever write a film script?
And important side question: did world cinema trivia really impress
Patna girls?
Satyajit Ray, Ritwik Ghatak and Saeed Mirza have been huge influences. I also like the early stylish Godard, Sam Peckinpah, Billy Wilder and John Ford. I love cinema across genres. Also I can sit through anything by Scorsese, Tarantino and Woody Allen. I am sure I have missed out on twenty other names. If there is a special preference, it would be American cinema of the 1970s. Those magnificent Easy Riders and Raging Bulls.
No,
I wouldn't write a screenplay, as cinema is a collaborative medium,
and I am a lone wolf by inclination and training.
My experience is that the easiest way to lose a girl's attention is to talk to her of world cinema or literature. But then I rarely meet the right kind of girls.
Ah,
that question was inspired by the narrator in your long-ago story 'A
Scene from Class Struggle in Patna' who says his movie trivia is good
only for quizzing and impressing girls. But that will teach me to
stop imagining that all your narrators are autobiographical!
Moving
on: your
characters – even the exceptionally literate, film-society-going
ones – inhabit a world that's often violent, sometimes sleazy. Did
you ever fear your readers might be repelled?
Some readers are always going to be repelled by the world I portray. Many are also bored stiff. But there is a tiny minority which will sit through anything that I write. God bless them.
One
of the things that has always made your writing stand out for me, at
least within Indian English fiction, is how frankly you deal with the
presence of caste – its networks, stereotypes, battles – and the
presence of sex. “A
woman who shouts "Jai
Mata Di"
or "yes please", or better still, "aur
tani jor se"
in throes of sexual congress, is worth pages of description of the
furniture in the bedroom,” as you once put it. Did/does this
unfetteredness come easily to you?
No, the unfetteredness does not come easily. It shouldn't either. As starlets in India traditionally say, they would wear a bikini if the role demands it, so it is with me. I will do the swimsuit round if the role demands it. Otherwise I am a wallflower by nature. As for caste, it really can't be avoided if you are writing fiction in India.
Is
Delhi a kind of exile from Patna, for your characters? And for you?
Do you feel part of a Bihari cultural diaspora?
In some ways, yes, it is kind of like an exile. But then I do Delhi also. I seriously started to write only when I came to Delhi University.
Do
you hang out with other writers? Do you discuss your writing with
anyone while it's happening?
I am afraid I don't hang out much. I do not have the time. My first reader is usually my wife. Sometimes I do share my finished work with Pankaj Mishra and Amitava Kumar. Pankaj especially has been a great support over the years.
You
don't do the litfest circuit. Do readers ever write to you? Any
interesting responses?
Sometimes I do get emails. Mostly of hate, but once in a while of love, too. In Chandigarh, at the only literary festival that I have attended, I was accosted by two ladies who said that they had come all the way from Canada to meet me. Turns out they wanted to meet Siddharth Chowdhury the painter. Talk about taking a wrong turn.
You
have a day job in a publishing house. What does your work day look
like? Does the publishing life intersect with the writerly life?
I think my day job as a publisher certainly enriches my writing. I get to read a lot of stuff I wouldn't normally pick up otherwise.
I
believe you do all your writing by hand. How does the rewriting and
editing happen?
I usually write the first three drafts of all my stories or sections in a novel by hand. With yellow Staedtler pencil on small spiral bound notebooks which I carry everywhere in my satchel. The fourth draft is usually typed out by my wife when she finds time. Afterwards I tinker with it for months on the computer, mostly working on the timing. For instance, the two stories that book-end Patna Manual, 'The Importer of Blondes' took over two years to write, 'Death of a Proofreader' close to a year.
You've
published two story collections and two novels. But Patna
Roughcut,
for instance, though called a novel, is as much a series of episodes
about overlapping characters, as The
Patna Manual of Style,
called 'Stories'.
If publishing didn't need these categories, would you describe your
books differently?
I
see Patna
Roughcut,
Day
Scholar
and The
Patna Manual of Style
as part of one big novel that I am working towards. In that sense it
is unfinished. Readers can read it in any way they want. As
individual stories or short novels which are part of a larger whole.
As long as they get it, it is fine by me. Labels are anyway only a
marketing tool. I am meanwhile working on a long story about Sudama
Pathak of Patna
Roughcut,
called 'The Prince of Patna'.
Published in Scroll.
No comments:
Post a Comment