My column for the Sunday Guardian this fortnight.
A large part of my adult life has been spent inside books. There are books I read too fast because I want to know what happens, and so must read a second time to savour all I missed. There are books I hate from page one, but read all the way through, sometimes because it's work (one cannot review half a book) and sometimes just out of masochism. There are books abandoned midway, which look at me accusingly as they sink to the bottom of a pile. There are books I refer to for facts magisterially marshalled, and books I turn to for analytical clarity. The best books are ways to enter the world afresh. But there are times when what you want is not to find a different route into the world, but to leave it behind entirely. Fantasy and science fiction are increasingly popular genres in writing for adults. But the books of my childhood provide a dual escape: a temporary reprieve from the adult world, and in the case of three of my most favourite children's books — an entry into a parallel universe. In the first of these, that parallel universe is an entirely domestic one, imagined to exist under the floorboards. Mary Norton's fertile imagination created a world of little people — six-inch-high creatures who looked and behaved like minature versions of ourselves, but lived by 'borrowing' from us all the little things that disappear so mysteriously from every home: "Safety pins, for instance... And all the other things we keep on buying. Again and again and again. Like pencils and matchboxes and sealing wax and hairpins and drawing pins and thimbles..." The Borrowers, as Norton named them, first appeared in print in 1952, and were such a success that she continued to create new adventures for her chosen fictional family — Homily, Pod and their daughter Arietty — for the next 30 years.
The thrill is also enhanced by
juxtaposition: the Borrowers, by their very nature, live in houses where
no new things happen, where the humans live to a routine. "Routine is
their safeguard," says old Mrs. May, who first tells Kate about them.
"They must know which rooms are to be used and when. They do not stay in
houses where there are careless people, or unruly children, or certain
household pets."
The last book — Tom's Midnight Garden — uses a third route to enter an alternative world: time. Philippa Pearce's 1958 tale -- of a boy stuck alone at an aunt and uncle's place for the summer — uses an old grandfather clock as the bridge between the regular world and a past one. When the clock strikes thirteen, late every night, Tom finds he can open an old rusty door and go into a garden that seems not to be there during the day. And there, in that world of the midnight garden, he forges a bond with a girl named Hattie — a bond that feels stronger than almost anything in the world of the day. But Pearce is not really interested in old-style magic. At the end of the book, she gives us an explanation that hovers on the edges of the psychological. But her vision of the garden — a place so intensely remembered that it manages to communicate to someone else — remains a haunting ode to the power of memory and dreams. |
||
Published in the Sunday Guardian. |
Hindi: chhoti haziri, vulg. hazri, 'little breakfast'; refreshment taken in the early morning, before or after the morning exercise. (Hobson-Jobson: A Glossary of Colloquial Anglo-Indian Words and Phrases, 1994 [1886])
20 November 2012
Post Facto: Keys to another world
Labels:
books,
children,
E. Nesbit,
fantasy fiction,
history,
magic,
The Borrowers,
Tom's Midnight Garden
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
"There are books abandoned midway, which look at me accusingly as they sink to the bottom of a pile."
And with good reason, too! I can never stop reading a book mid-way, no matter how bad. Great post. Completely agree about Nesbit v. Blyton. Much as I loved Blyton growing up, Nesbit I find easier to re-read in adulthood, perhaps because its less sugary-sweet.
Haha, yes, with good reason. Just a bad case of too many books...
But thanks, and yes, you're probably right about Blyton's sugariness, though there's also just the formulaic-ness -- of the magical stories, at least. I think I am happier to re-read her mysteries and most of all, her school stories. Would be fun to think
about why that is, in more detail.
True. They mysteries would probably still appeal, but the fantasy stuff - just one wishing chair too many, I think!
Post a Comment