A short review I did for Time Out:
Beteille's French grandmother with his father, Maurice. |
André Béteille: Sunlight on the Garden
Penguin Viking, Rs. 499
André Béteille, the distinguished sociologist, has
written a rare and delightful memoir. By limiting the book to his
“childhood and youth”, Béteille frees himself to explore the first 26
years of his life in wonderfully observant detail. He begins with a
memorable description of his two grandmothers, one Bengali and the other
French. Both were widows “in straitened circumstances” who lived in the
small French-Bengali town of Chandannagar – but they never met. His
paternal grandmother was the child of French indigo planters. She
married a French colonial official who died of cholera, leaving her with
a young son and no money. She spent a lifetime keeping up appearances,
and felt shamed by her son’s marriage to “a native woman”. Béteille and
his siblings were not welcome in her house; he describes with acuity
their childhood fascination with this mysterious place, which they
passed every day, but did not enter.
But even
here, remembering things that must have been profoundly affecting,
Béteille is his restrained, observant self: “Perhaps my peculiar
childhood has made me unusually sensitive to the processes of social
exclusion...”, he writes, before moving on to his other grandmother, a
Bengali Brahmin widow who was as close as the other was distant. His
portrait of her is deeply affectionate, but never shies away from the
uncomfortable detail. His fond memories of her morning Ganga snaan and
her simple, wholesome cooking do not prevent him from a clear-eyed
recounting of her “pride of caste”, embedded in such tiny things as her
calling his childish temper “the rage of a Chandala”.
It
is this sort of constant, quiet contextualising that makes this book so
enlightening, even when speaking of the most commonplace things. And
yet Béteille’s sociological eye never swamps the individual. The
temperamental mismatch between his parents, for instance, is given
cultural heft by contrasting their different attitudes to privacy – “My
mother, like most Indians, did not distinguish between privacy and
secrecy, regarding them both as evils of the same kind” – but not
explained away by it.
In general – whether discussing his own family or the middle class Bengali families of his friends, whether analysing the institutions of his formal education or the ’40s North Calcutta neighbourhood where he gained an informal one – Beteille turns upon the world a gaze that is thorough and unsentimental, unsparing yet always sympathetic. He is, in the best possible way, a participant observer in his own life.
No comments:
Post a Comment