Today's Mumbai Mirror column:
The late actress Nanda is usually remembered for her girlish innocence. But that wasn't all there was to her.
Nanda's
death in March this year was mourned by the industry. But as in life,
so in death: she didn't really get the critical attention she
deserved. Nanda was that rare actress whom the usually inflexible
Hindi film industry allowed to graduate from one slot to another,
embracing her first as a child artiste (in films like Mandir
[1948], Angaarey, Jaggu [1952] and Jagriti, then as the younger
sister (in V. Shantaram's Toofan Aur Diya [1956], Bhabhi [1957], Dulhan [1958], Chhoti
Behen [1959]
and Kala Bazaar [1960]) and finally as a romantic heroine (after
Dev Anand kept a promise made during Kala Bazaar and cast her as his
heroine in Hum Dono [1961]).
Despite this, there is a Nanda
stereotype. We think of her as the achchhi ladki, the simple
girl who could be coyly romantic but not sensual. The childlike
innocence that had worked for Baby Nanda segued seamlessly into
chhoti behen roles (younger sisters have always been
infantilised by Hindi cinema) and seemingly clung to her even as she
transitioned into playing romantic leads. Her good girl image was
also a result of the sharply moral heroine-vamp divide that
characterised the era. The heroine had to exemplify 'Indianness'; the
vamp was 'Western', if not racially then culturally. The heroine's
non-threatening sexuality meant being virginal, and putting her
charms on display only for the hero. This was in stark contrast to
the vamp's open display of desire (invariably unfulfilled), which in
conjunction with her other sins -- smoking, drinking and alcohol –
had, of course, to be punished.
One of my favourite Nanda appearances
is in an unusually sophisticated version of the good girl-bad girl
narrative: Teen Devian [1965]. Nanda plays the wholesome middle class
girl, literally the girl next door, but her rivals are not cabaret
dancers – a category the audience knows can never succeed with a
hero -- but liberated memsahibs. Both Simi the well-connected
socialite and Kalpana the famous actress flirt outrageously with our
music-shop-salesman-turned-poet. Whereas with Nanda, it is Dev who
flirts and Nanda who coyly accepts his overtures. Though perhaps this
is not quite true either. In an adorable and surprising early scene,
on their first coffee date, Dev asks to see Nanda's hardworking
secretarial fingers. “Is this just an excuse to hold my hand?”
asks Nanda. “Aur agar kahoon haan?” says the unflappable Dev.
“Then I will oblige you,” says Nanda in English.
In the more mainstream Gumnaam
(1965) and The Train (1970), Nanda's good girl Indianness is
produced at least partially by being pitted against our most
memorable vamp: Helen. Usually the heroine and the vamp never share
the same space, it being a given that the vamp's netherworld of
lowlit restaurants and hotel bars is not one in which a respectable
Indian woman would ever find herself.
But both Gumnaam and The
Train are slightly unusual in this respect. In Gumnaam (a
pretty awful cannibalising of Agatha Christie's And Then There
Were None), Nanda and Helen, bearing the religiously-marked names
Miss Asha and Miss Kitty, appear in the same frame quite early on.
They are both on the fateful plane ride that will seal the fate of
its ten passengers. Of course, Nanda wears white, and Helen red.
Then, though both swiftly acquire boyfriends among the men they're
marooned with, they keep their distance from each other. The bad girl
spends most of her time with a drunken Pran, the good girl with a
constipated-looking Manoj Kumar. But having put this effort into
keeping them apart, the filmmakers decided some frisson would arise
from having them bond. So we get Helen, who has spent many scenes
before this refusing to drink with Pran, deciding to get drunk --
with Nanda! And they have a blast, until Nanda is violently shaken
back to reality by Manoj Kumar, who being Mr. Bharat cannot be
expected to enjoy himself. What I thought was fascinating was MK's
sarcastic heroine-shaming dialogue, uttered in full hearing range of
the vamp: “Ab bhi tum mein aur Kitty mein thoda sa fark baaki
hai”.
In The Train [1970], which like
Gumnaam was a murder mystery, cabaret dancer Helen (Lily) is
the rotten apple, and Nanda (Nita) the misjudged goody-goody one. So
Helen gets to throatily proposition Rajesh Khanna, while Nanda only
gets to lie with his head in her lap. But then Nita gets a job as a
hotel receptionist, letting her into the same space as Lily. And then
the film does something truly unexpected: it gives us a glimpse of
the 'bad' Nanda. Instead of the saree-clad version with a long choti,
we suddenly see a 'Westernised' Nanda with a stylish haircut, the
hushed voice and swaying derriere now those of a seductress in a
murderous plot.
It seems to me that Nanda's overt
innocence was precisely what enabled directors to use her to play on
this “fark” between the heroine and vamp -- clearly
thrilling male audiences but being careful to eventually re-establish
moral order so as not to alarm them.
But remarkably, Nanda didn't stop
there. In order to see where this fascinating trajectory took her,
watch Yash Chopra's Ittefaq. The vamp-virgin divide is
hopefully gone forever, but Nanda needs to be given some posthumous
credit for having crossed the line when she did.
Published in the Mumbai Mirror.
I saw Nanda as always the goody goody adarsh Hindu Nari of Bollywood. Had no idea that she did cross the line partially or even fully, in some films. She indeed deserves more accolades and critical acclaim than she got.
ReplyDelete